A forum for VE lucubration

Saturday, July 22, 2006

The Intellectual Virtue of Originality and the New Evil Demon Problem

I just recently read a post of Jon Kvanvig’s over at Certain Doubts which, I think, highlights a thus-far under-addressed aspect of VE, which is how to reconcile our intuitions that some virtues are proper intellectual virtues, whilst admitting that these virtues are not likely to lead possessors to a propensity of true beliefs over false ones. Kvanvig addresses a particular virtue of this sort (note: I admit I can’t think of many others), “originality,” and stipulates at the outset that it is an important intellectual virtue; however, he notes, it is not the case that a belief is more likely to be true if it has arisen out of originality than if it did not arise from originality. Kvanvig gives some suggestions for how we might be able to reconcile apparently conflicting intuitions that (1) the non-truth-conducive “virtue” of originality is an intellectual virtue, while (2) virtues are intellectual virtues only if a relationship holds between possessing the virtue and (at least to some extent) raising the probability that beliefs arising out of that virtue are more likely to be true than if they did not arise out of that virtue. Kvanvig concludes that there is a dearth of literature on (specifically) originality as an intellectual virtue, and I agree. I think a good place to begin such a project would be to try to isolate just what properties one has when one has the character trait of “originality” that leads us to want to say it falls within the domain of intellectual virtue, a domain we reserve for character traits that (unlike originality) do lead possessors to engender a higher propensity of true beliefs to false ones (than would be the case if the virtue weren’t possessed).
Rather than to attempt to address that (a question well worth addressing, I think) in this post, I want to offer some other thoughts I’ve been having about originality as an intellectual virtue—some thoughts related to aspects of originality that have nothing to do with whether the virtue is truth-conducive, but rather, whether beliefs arising out of that particular trait must, in fact, be original.
These thoughts arose while I was reading Sosa’s 1991 paper “Reliabilism and Intellectual Virtue” (reprinted in Axtell “Knowledge, Belief and Character” 2000). Sosa begins that paper with what he takes to be the three most significant problems faced by generic reliabilism, which he defines as: “S’s belief that p at t is justified if it is the outcome of a process of belief acquisition or retention that is reliable, or leads to a sufficiently high preponderance of true beliefs over false beliefs” (19).
The three problems he mentions are: (1) the generality problem, (2) the new evil-demon problem, (3) the meta-incoherence problem.
What I think has some interesting consequences for the issue of accepting originality as an intellectual virtue pertains specifically to what Sosa mentions about the New Evil Demon problem. He explicates the problem as follows:

“The evil-demon problem for reliabilism is not Descartes’ problem, of course, but it is a relative. What if twins of ours in another possible world were given mental lives just like ours down to the most minute detail of experience or thought, etc., though they were also totally in error about the nature of their surroundings, and their perceptual and inferential processes of belief acquisition accomplished very little except to sink them more and more deeply and systematically into error? Shall we say that we are justified in our beliefs and our twins are not? They are quite wrong in their beliefs, of course, but it seems somehow very implausible to suppose that they are unjustified” (20).
The thought here which drives Sosa’s (I think correct) assessment that it’s not the case that our twins aren’t justified even though they’re in the same mental state as we are whilst being justified, suggests that Sosa accepts something (I offer) like the following, on which the force of the New Evil Demon problem rests:

If A and B have lead identical mental lives, then it cannot be the case that at any time t, A is justified in a belief P at t whilst B (holding the same belief p) is unjustified at t.

The extent to which the above maxim is forceful is the extent to which it threatens reliabilism, which bestows justification on a belief by virtue of external conditions (i.e. is the belief in fact reliable) which depend on features of the world (i.e. does the world fit the belief) that can be outside the control of the epistemic agent. And in the New Evil Demon case, it is precisely because there are features outside of our twin’s control (i.e. they are, whilst mentally identical to us, being deceived while we aren’t) that lead some reliabilists to say that the twins’ beliefs aren’t justified. While there have been attempts to circumvent this problem—such as Goldman’s historical reliabilism--there are others, such as Fairweather, who find reliabilism abject for the reason that it has no good way of accounting for our intuitions that our twin is justified.

Rather than to address here different ways reliabilists have tried to answer the New Evil Demon Problem, I want to (finally!) draw what I think is a key analogy between New Evil Problem for reliabilism, and a parallel problem that crops up when we begin to consider “originality” as a candidate for intellectual virtue. The parallel is not perfectly isomorphic, but it illuminates an important feature of originality that might pose problems (not necessarily just for reliabilist minded VE theorists) for its candidacy as a proper intellectual virtue.

Consider, again, what it was that drives us to say, in the New Evil Demon case that the twins’ beliefs, though false, are nonetheless justified:

Maxim A: If A and B have lead identical mental lives, then it cannot be the case that at any time t, A is justified in a belief P at t whilst B (holding the same belief p) is unjustified at t.

Those who accept the New Evil Demon problem as problematic for reliaibilism, and do so because they accept something like Maxim A, will probably be receptive to a slightly different maxim, which has as its focus not justificatory conditions, per se, but conditions of being in a particular state of virtue:

Maxim B: If A and B have lead identical mental lives and identical dispositions of character, then it cannot be the case that at any time t, A possesses an intellectual virtue V at t whilst B (whilst possessing an identical mental life of a as well as identical dispositions of character as A possesses) does not possess intellectual virtue V at t.

A conundrum arises, though, for anyone who wants to accept Maxim B and grant that originality is an intellectual virtue. Consider the following example.
The Case of the Jailed Novelists

Jack and Phil are novelists, who are locked in separate jail cells. Each has a typewriter, a collection of the same books (for inspiration), and similarly motivated to write original novels, and each understands originality as world-relative. Jack lives on Earth, where there are only a couple million serious novelists. Phil, however, lives on planet Malthus, which hosts exactly 8 trillion google serious novelists, each which is, like Phil and Jack, motivated to write original novels. Jack knows of no other worlds but Earth, and Phil knows of no other worlds than Malthus. Additionally, the following counterfactual holds true for Jack and Phil: if Jack and Phil were writing on Earth (with the same motivation and opportunity to write original novels), each would write exactly 10 original novels.
As things unfold, Jack, on Earth, does in fact produce 10 original novels whilst in his jail cell. Phil, who writes the same amount as Jack (and exactly what he (Phil) would have written if his jail cell were on Earth), gets unlucky. The population of Malthus is so great that none of what Phil has written turns out to be original; for each book that Phil wrote, someone else on Malthus had already written a book similar to the extent relevant to preclude it from being original.
If we grant pace Aristotle (and Zagzebski) that virtues have a motivation and a reliable success condition, then we’ll be inclined to say that for both Jack and Phil, the motivation condition is met (each passionately wishes to write original novels), however Jack meets the success condition and Phil fails it. And so, the verdict would seem to be that Jack possesses the intellectual virtue of originality while Phil fails it.

This conclusion, though, is incompatible with Maxim B, which (recall) states:

Maxim B: If A and B have lead identical mental lives and identical dispositions of character, then it cannot be the case that at any time t, A possesses an intellectual virtue V at t whilst B (whilst possessing an identical mental life of a as well as identical dispositions of character as A possesses) does not possess intellectual virtue V at t.

And if we find Maxim B plausible (which, I think, we will if we find Maxim A plausible, as both are similarly motivated), we find ourselves in a stalemate of intuitions quite similar to the stalemate of intuitions that crops up when considering the dilemma of reconciling the unreliability of our twins (who we want to say are justified in their beliefs) in the demon world and Maxim A, which drives the New Evil Demon problem.

What can be learned from these stalemates? Perhaps, a close examination of reliabilist attempts to solve the New Evil Demon problem could shed some light on ways to reconcile Maxim B with the inclination to say that Phil is every bit as original as Jack. Another avenue I think might be profitable to pursue would be to note a certain property that is shared by both originality and reliability: each has an external success condition such that, for agents A and B who have identical mental and dispositional lives, A could meet the success condition (for either originality or reliability) and B could fail to do so.

Also, interestingly, the fact that the “B” analogues in our cases (i.e. our twins in the first case, and Phil in the second) fail the success condition of their respective property (reliability for the twins, originality for Phil) is out of the control of these agents. Put another way: our twins can’t help (or even know) that they are being deceived by an evil demon. And analogously, Phil can’t help (or even know) that the planet in which he desires to write original novels happens to have an astronomical number of aspirant novelists scribing away outside of his jail cell.

Now that we see the resemblance between what is going on in the New Evil Demon case and in the Jack-and-Phil originality case, we seem to be left with some lines in the sand which beg us to pick a side. On one side of the line might be those who are prepared to embrace something like the following:

1. Either both Jack and Phil have the intellectual virtue of originality, or originality isn’t an intellectual virtue.
2. Originality is an intellectual virtue.
3. Therefore, Jack and Phil both have the virtue of originality.
4. If Jack and Phil both have the virtue of originality, then whether one has the virtue of originality does not depend on externalist criteria that could hold outside the agent(s) control or awareness.
5. Therefore, whether one has the virtue of originality does not depend on externalist criteria that could hold outside the agent(s) control or awareness.

On the other side of the line, though, we might encounter the following antithetical argument:

1. If reliability and originality are intellectual virtues, then whether one possesses (either of) them will depend on whether one is, at least generally, reliable or original.
2. Whether one is reliable or original depends, at least in part, on features of the world that could be beyond the agent’s awareness of control.
3. Reliability and originality are intellectual virtues.
4. Therefore, some intellectual virtues (at least reliability and originality) are such that whether one possesses them depends in part on unknown/uncontrollable features of the world.
5. If whether one possesses a virtue depends to any extent on features of the world beyond one’s cognizance/control, then Maxim A and Maxim B are false.
6. Maxim A and Maxim B are false.
7. We have reason to doubt that (in the New Evil Demon case) we are justified and our twins aren’t and in the originality case, that Jack has the virtue of originality and Phil isn’t, only if Maxim A and B (respectively) are true.
8. Therefore, we have no reason to doubt (in the New Evil Demon case) that we are justified and our twins aren’t and in the originality case that Jack has the virtue of originality and Phil doesn’t.

Unfortunately, at this point, I have one leg on both sides of the line.


Anonymous nenad_miscevic said...

Consider Old Camp Guard Problem:
Every time Shlomo the camp inmate shows compassion (generosity, etc.), the SS camp guard, unbeknownst to Shlomo tortures and executes 100 inmates. Shlomo’s compassion is not very helpful, for he has no means, but, due to the guards malice, it “produces” terrible consequences each time it manifests itself.
Morals: with a bit of bad luck, any moral virtue can get counterproductive. So, why wonder about the same thing happening to epistemic virtue?

9:56 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Halo. It is a nice site!

1:33 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Halo. Good work!
Visit my site viagra
buy http://delta-space.info/phentermine.htm viagra online

10:20 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good evening. Nice!
Visit my site phentermine
buy http://freeunixhs.info/phentermine.htm phentermine online

6:10 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello Cool site!
buy viagra
cheap viagra online

5:08 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ja das ist fantastish!
buy viagra
cheap viagra online

2:31 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Das ist fantastish!
buy viagra,
cheap http://viagra.alldating.org/viagra.htm online

2:20 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello people, try our products!
buy phentermine online,
cheap http://xrjuhosting.info/phentermine.htm phentermine
Thanks a lot.

1:14 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi, interesting site.
visit smoking stop
http://stop-smoking-aid.batcave.net/smoking-stop.htm smoking stop

11:16 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi, very intersting cite. Thanks for information!
[url=http://models4.azure-shift.info/tawny-roberts.htm]tawny roberts[/url]

4:03 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello, thanks author. Look at my site.
buy [url=http://www.rhodesschool.com/blogcomments/default.asp?blogID=23193]phentermine[/url]
http://www.rhodesschool.com/blogcomments/default.asp?blogID=23193 phentermine

3:48 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good evening, thanks author.
my page [url=http://viagra-store.info/]viara[/url].
Here you can buy http://viagra-store.info#viagra cheap.

11:24 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good morning, thanks author.
My site here [url=http://www.youthpeer.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=327]viara[/url].
Take http://www.youthpeer.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=327#viagra best.

2:42 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hurra, cool site.
My site here [url=http://www.theologicalforum.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=58]phentermine[/url].
Here you can buy http://www.theologicalforum.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=58#phentermine cheap.

8:59 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Halo, cool design.
Go here [url=http://bowtrol-herbal.info]viagra[/url].
Here you can buy http://bowtrol-herbal.info#viagra online.

7:33 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi all! Really an excellent site - it's always a pleasure to come back [url=http://med911.t35.com/lipitor.html]lipitor[/url] [url=http://med911.t35.com/tramadol.html]tramadol[/url] [url=http://med911.t35.com/soma.html]soma[/url] [url=http://med911.t35.com/viagra.html]viagra[/url]
[url=http://lipus.o rg/zoloft.html]zoloft[/url]http://soma-911.blogspot.com http://tramadol-911.blogspot.com/ [url=http://tramadol-911.blogspot.com ]tramadol[/url] [url=http://soma-911.blogspot.com]soma[/url]other [url=http://med911.t35.com/doctor-lipitor-vs-zocor.html]doctor lipitor vs zocor[/url] or [url=http://med911.t35.com/canada-lipitor.html]canada lipitor[/url] tramadol [url=http://med911.t35.com/lipitor-drug-interaction.html]lipitor drug interaction[/url] and look this [url=http://med911.t35.com/soma-350mg.html]soma 350mg[/url] lipitor [url=http://med911.t35.com/soma-sale.html]soma sale[/url] and very creative :[url=http://med911.t35.com/soma-addiction.html]soma addiction[/url] and else [url=http://med911.t35.com/soma-drink.html]soma drink[/url] or [url=http://med911.t35.com/soma-half-iron-man.html]soma half iron man[/url] and this :[url=http://med911.t35.com/soma-holiday.html]soma holiday[/url] other [url=http://med911.t35.com/zoloft.html]zoloft[/url] lipitor [url=http://med911.t35.com/zoloft-and-breast-feeding.html]zoloft and breast feeding[/url] viagra [url=http://med911.t35.com/symptom-of-zoloft.html]symptom of zoloft[/url] and [url=http://med911.t35.com/zoloft-addiction.html]zoloft addiction[/url] and this :[url=http://med911.t35.com/generic-viagra.html]generic viagra[/url] tramadol [url=http://med911.t35.com/herbal-viagra.html]herbal viagra[/url] else [url=http://med911.t35.com/cheap-viagra-online.html]cheap viagra online[/url] and very creative :[url=http://med911.t35.com/viagra-price.html]viagra price[/url] and this :[url=http://med911.t35.com/viagra-without-prescription.html]viagra without prescription[/url] other [url=http://med911.t35.com/cialis-levitra-sales-
viagra.html]cialis levitra sales viagra[/url] and very creative :[url=http://med911.t35.com/effects-side-tramadol.html]effects side tramadol[/url] cool info : [url=http://med911.t35.com/link-tramadol.html]link tramadol[/url] look this [url=http://med911.t35.com/tramadol-withdrawal.html]tramadol withdrawal[/url] cool info : [url=http://med911.t35.com/sale-tramadol.html]sale tramadol[/url] and [url=http://med911.t35.com/allegra-combined-zyrtec.html]allegra combined zyrtec[/url]Good luck!

8:58 AM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, I recently added a news widget from www.widgetmate.com to my blog. It shows the latest news, and just took a copy and paste to implement. Might interest you too.

9:13 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello it is nice site!! anabolic steroids for sale

3:22 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi! Cool site! It is my homepage:http://pharma24.t35.com/anabolic

10:17 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact
was a amusement account it. Look advanced to far
added agreeable from you! However, how can we

Here is my web blog spartans - -

7:37 PM

Anonymous Anonymous said...

When I originally commented I clicked the "Notify me when new comments are added" checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get several e-mails with the same comment.
Is there any way you can remove people from that service?

Also visit my website: premises

11:30 PM

Blogger oakleyses said...

jordan shoes, christian louboutin, uggs outlet, michael kors outlet online, uggs on sale, louis vuitton outlet, louis vuitton outlet, louis vuitton, ray ban sunglasses, replica watches, christian louboutin uk, chanel handbags, michael kors outlet online, uggs outlet, longchamp outlet, nike air max, michael kors outlet, burberry handbags, tiffany and co, polo outlet, nike free, nike air max, ugg boots, oakley sunglasses, ray ban sunglasses, michael kors outlet online, oakley sunglasses, christian louboutin outlet, longchamp outlet, prada handbags, gucci handbags, prada outlet, oakley sunglasses wholesale, michael kors outlet, oakley sunglasses, kate spade outlet, christian louboutin shoes, louis vuitton outlet, tory burch outlet, ugg boots, michael kors outlet online, burberry outlet, cheap oakley sunglasses, louis vuitton, ray ban sunglasses, nike outlet, longchamp outlet

6:53 AM

Blogger oakleyses said...

sac vanessa bruno, new balance, vans pas cher, ray ban uk, nike blazer pas cher, true religion outlet, michael kors outlet, true religion outlet, replica handbags, polo lacoste, oakley pas cher, coach purses, hollister uk, abercrombie and fitch uk, nike free uk, north face uk, louboutin pas cher, polo ralph lauren, hollister pas cher, nike air max uk, michael kors pas cher, nike air max, true religion jeans, timberland pas cher, nike air max uk, coach outlet, air max, michael kors, jordan pas cher, sac hermes, north face, lululemon canada, coach outlet store online, nike roshe, sac longchamp pas cher, nike air force, mulberry uk, hogan outlet, ralph lauren uk, longchamp pas cher, michael kors, converse pas cher, burberry pas cher, nike roshe run uk, true religion outlet, kate spade, nike free run, nike tn, ray ban pas cher, guess pas cher

6:55 AM

Blogger oakleyses said...

asics running shoes, babyliss, soccer jerseys, hermes belt, reebok outlet, ipad cases, oakley, iphone cases, soccer shoes, iphone 5s cases, nfl jerseys, north face outlet, abercrombie and fitch, ghd hair, vans outlet, iphone 6 cases, hollister, nike roshe run, wedding dresses, mac cosmetics, lululemon, new balance shoes, jimmy choo outlet, instyler, giuseppe zanotti outlet, p90x workout, s6 case, chi flat iron, iphone 6s cases, longchamp uk, baseball bats, mcm handbags, iphone 6 plus cases, bottega veneta, ferragamo shoes, timberland boots, mont blanc pens, insanity workout, nike air max, nike trainers uk, herve leger, nike huaraches, celine handbags, north face outlet, beats by dre, iphone 6s plus cases, valentino shoes, ralph lauren, hollister clothing, louboutin

6:59 AM

Blogger oakleyses said...

moncler uk, louis vuitton, thomas sabo, wedding dresses, barbour, moncler, gucci, montre pas cher, supra shoes, hollister, barbour uk, nike air max, karen millen uk, pandora uk, moncler, canada goose uk, coach outlet, ugg, juicy couture outlet, swarovski, canada goose, louis vuitton, moncler outlet, louis vuitton, hollister, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, canada goose outlet, replica watches, pandora jewelry, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, moncler, canada goose outlet, ugg pas cher, louis vuitton, juicy couture outlet, swarovski crystal, louis vuitton, canada goose, pandora charms, canada goose outlet, links of london, marc jacobs, lancel, converse, converse outlet, toms shoes, doudoune moncler, moncler, pandora jewelry, canada goose jackets, vans, canada goose

7:03 AM

Blogger Hà Nguyễn said...

I was working and suddenly I visits your site frequently and recommended it to me to read also. The writing style is superior and the content is relevant. Thanks for the insight you provide the readers!

5:40 AM

Blogger dong dong23 said...

canada goose clearance
coach outlet
ugg boots
ugg boots
burberry outlet
cheap oakley sunglasses
adidas shoes
polo ralph lauren outlet
tory burch outlet
coach wallets

7:41 AM

Blogger Love Kpop said...

I like to get up early to go out and breathe fresh air. I feel that it is good for health and a good habit

3:00 AM

Blogger Fghkfhk Dfgaert said...

tag heuer watches
longchamp outlet
jack wolfskin
uggs outlet
ray ban sunglasses
ray ban sunglasses
polo ralph lauren
polo outlet
lebron james shoes
pacers jerseys

8:23 AM

Blogger Yaro Gabriel said...

off white
giuseppe zanotti outlet
tory burch outlet
air max 97
coach outlet
pandora charms
air jordan shoes
coach outlet online
cheap nfl jerseys
bcbg dresses

10:51 AM


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home